Solo Experience free essay sample

More than 50 miles from the closest service station and a five-day paddle from any kind of foundation, I ventured out of the kayak, waved farewell to my kindred heads in preparing and entered the obscure. Equipped with my folding knife, a covering, 20 feet of rope, an angling pole, a Bible, a diary, my camping cot, garments, water, an apple and two granola bars, I unexpectedly understood that for the following 48 hours, these eventual my lone sidekicks. As I remained on the shoreline, gazing into the breaking down woods of Northern Quebec, with the sun setting on my back, I was solidified and disturbed. Smacking at multitudes of no-see-ums and mosquitoes, I pondered, Whose thought was this in any case? What advantage is there to going through two days alone with only trees and bugs? Arousing the following morning to a doused hiking bed and beating precipitation just increased my discontent, yet it was under these conditions that I had the option to unmistakably look at my life in a manner I never had. We will compose a custom exposition test on Solo Experience or then again any comparable theme explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page As my performance experience followed all the way through, the idiom The calmer you become, the more you can hear took on an entirely different importance. I had been in the wild previously; a large portion of my mid year had been spent outside ascending mountains and developing in a gathering dynamic. Be that as it may, being here alone, expelled from each interruption in such a remote spot, had a totally unique impact. What began as an apparently silly and upsetting recommendation changed into a useful one that I realized I would exploit. Along these lines, rather than sitting under the canvas agonizing about my adversity and reviling the downpour, I capitalized on it. Each trouble that came my direction, I took on with ardent energy. At the point when it began to rain and I got wet since I hadnt set up my canvas effectively, it was my shortcoming. There was nobody else to fault. The acknowledgment that I was answerable for controlling untouched and activity and conquering all contention had a quick impact. Thus, as I approached my day perusing, angling and composing, I experienced some genuine thoughtfulness. Thus I started to consid er myself to be an individual skilled at conquering difficulties of any condition. As I came to see my own capacity and potential, I additionally wound up inspecting the numerous connections and individuals who have graced my life. From family to companions, away from the ordinary buzzing about of life, evaluation and examination of how my activities influenced both their lives and mine turned out to be progressively common. As the hours wore on, my stomach began to snarl, and inconvenience arrived at a record-breaking high. Strangely, however, things became more clear. The misfortune had in certainty produced a development procedure, one that would stay with me and furnish me with another feeling of distinction and consciousness of my job as an individual. What's more, despite the fact that I was hopeless, ravenous and disturbed at that point, thinking back, I value those minutes to myself crouched in an absorbed camping bed the center of no place.

Crime And Punishment Essay Thesis Example For Students

Wrongdoing And Punishment Essay Thesis Before the finish of Dostoyeskys Crime and Punishment, the peruser is not, at this point under the hallucination of the conceivable presence of exceptional men. For a liberal peruser, and even maybe the shut disapproved of ones as well, the book is an excursion through Raskolnikovs proposed hypothesis on wrongdoing. It is a hypothesis dependent on the thoughts that had been printed and perused a thousand times(313) by both Hegel and Nietzsche. Hegel, a German thinker, affected Dostoyesky with his utilitarian accentuation on the finishes instead of the methods whereby a superman existed as one that remained over the normal man, however worked to assist all humankind. Nietsches progressively narrow minded way of thinking concentrated on the rights to control which permitted one to act in a Hegelian way. In perpetrating his wrongdoing, Raskolnikov encountered a definitive discipline as he understood that his reality was not that of the exceptional man introduced in his hypothesis. In se ction five of section three in Crime and Punishment, this hypothesis is laid out by its maker, Raskolnikov. Such an inventive hypothesis would plainly have set him in the unprecedented classification, yet when he neglects to satisfy its guidelines, by submitting to the precedent-based law through his admission, the hypothesis disintegrates directly before the perusers eyes. Most of Raskolnikovs hypothesis appears to be coherent until the peruser shows up at its single basic defect. Raskolnikovs thought that the sanctioning of a wrongdoing is constantly joined by illness(311) was one part of the hypothesis which, through its precision in Raskolnikovs wrongdoing, appeared to loan legitimacy to the total of the hypothesis; a few brief encounters with faintness for the character Raskolnikovs benefit, intimate the veracity of his thoughts. In the wake of gathering from the discernment of Raskolnikovs speculation on sickness that the remainder of his working hypothesis would too be right, the peruser is driven down a way of positive desires for his/her unprecedented storyteller. This way would have been one whereby Raskolnikov had the option to execute boundless prosperity because of his homicides. Besides, he would have had the option to evade accommodation to the customary law of the standard individuals so as to save his significance. This isn't, truth be told, what occurs however. Or maybe, Raskolnikov is compelled to admit by a few components including the very dread of being found. This dread is accentuated to show his relocation from the remarkable man; a phenomenal man would not have had such feelings of trepidation since he would realize that he reserved an option to execute such activities . At the point when Raskolnikov in the end confesses, first to Sonia and afterward to Porfiry, the novel peaks as the peru ser forsakes all expectation for the presence of any reality in the midst of the hypothesis of the unprecedented. After his admission, Raskolnikov encountered the physical disciplines for his activities; be that as it may, unquestionably progressively meticulous was his past discipline as he endured the departure of a still, small voice fight upon the self acknowledgment that he was after all only a customary man or that, much more dreadful along these lines, on the off chance that he was to be sure an exceptional one, that his hypothesis had been an invalid exercise in futility. In a subliminal exertion to ensure his long lasting work, he admitted, consequently admitting to normality, yet safeguarding the believability of his hypothesis. In these last endeavors to forestall the decimation of his hypothesis, obviously Raskolnikovs endeavor to postpone piddling subtleties until he by and by encountered a homicide in the shoes of an exceptional man was a disappointment. Despite the fact that he attempted to legitimize the imperfect hypothesis by turning into the common man, the peruser can see that his real hypothesis, not his title, was to be faulted; the end doesn't generally legitimize the methods particularly on account of homicide. .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07 , .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07 .postImageUrl , .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07 .focused content zone { min-tallness: 80px; position: relative; } .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07 , .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07:hover , .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07:visited , .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07:active { border:0!important; } .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07 .clearfix:after { content: ; show: table; clear: both; } .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07 { show: square; change: foundation shading 250ms; webkit-progress: foundation shading 250ms; width: 100%; obscurity: 1; progress: murkiness 250ms; webkit-progress: haziness 250ms; foundation shading: #95A5A6; } .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07:active , .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07:hover { mistiness: 1; progress: darkness 250ms; webkit-progress: haziness 250ms; foundation shading: #2C3E50; } .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07 .focused content territory { width: 100%; position: re lative; } .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07 .ctaText { fringe base: 0 strong #fff; shading: #2980B9; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: striking; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; content adornment: underline; } .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07 .postTitle { shading: #FFFFFF; text dimension: 16px; textual style weight: 600; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; width: 100%; } .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07 .ctaButton { foundation shading: #7F8C8D!important; shading: #2980B9; outskirt: none; fringe range: 3px; box-shadow: none; text dimension: 14px; textual style weight: intense; line-stature: 26px; moz-fringe span: 3px; content adjust: focus; content embellishment: none; content shadow: none; width: 80px; min-tallness: 80px; foundation: url(https://artscolumbia.org/wp-content/modules/intelly-related-posts/resources/pictures/straightforward arrow.png)no-rehash; position: total; right: 0; top: 0; } .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07:hover .ctaButton { foundation shading: #34495E!important; } . u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07 .focused content { show: table; tallness: 80px; cushioning left: 18px; top: 0; } .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07-content { show: table-cell; edge: 0; cushioning: 0; cushioning right: 108px; position: relative; vertical-adjust: center; width: 100%; } .u69a2471b8be12901fac7d7db8ca15f07:after { content: ; show: square; clear: both; } READ: After anne forthright EssayDostoevskys incongruity lays inside Raskolnikovs obvious absence of blame for Lizavetas murder. He only here and there thinks about her homicide, however is devoured by the blamable contemplations of having slaughtered Alyona. The amusing perspective is that he had proposed to slaughter Alyona and killing her would have been legitimate as per his hypothesis thinking about that she was believed to be foul, wicked, and severe. Lizaveta on he other hand was a sort, warm, and cherishing character making no damage the world. Raskolnikovs compassion towards Aylona as opposed to Lizaveta mirror s his own malicious nature in that he couldn't identify with the qualities of good. By reflecting upon Raskolnikovs malicious nature, Dotoyevsy utilizes tone in his endeavors to dismiss Raskolnikovs hypothesis. The once liberal peruser is left to always dismiss untested speculations because of the disappointment of Raskolnikovs thoughts on the uncommon man.Words/Pages : 751/24

Till We Have Love Comparative Analysis Incorporating Four Loves and the Bible - Literature Essay Samples

â€Å"‘God is love,’ says St John.† (Four Loves 1) Love is arguably the most important concept for humanity to grasp and understand. It’s what unites families and friendships. It’s what gives meaning to the everyday activities. Without love, a mother doing laundry for her family is merely a task to be completed. However, with love, it is a way for her to show care and devotion. Love takes the mundane and makes it meaningful. Love is a powerful force that overcomes boundaries of race, religion, age, and culture. And if what St John said is true, that God is love, then love should be exactly what will pave the path to God. C.S. Lewis, one of the most renowned writers of the twentieth century, wrote extensively about love in his book, The Four Loves. In his book, he discusses what the different types of love look like: how they should be and how they are often perverted. Lewis also authored many works of fiction, one of which being Till We Have Faces, a retelling of the myth of Cupid and Psyche. One of the main themes of t his novel is love, and it is represented clearly through many of the main characters. C.S. Lewis’s concepts of love discussed in his book, The Four Loves, are largely represented in and through the characters of his final work of fiction, Till We Have Faces. Redival, the sister of the main character, represents a perversion of what C.S. Lewis discusses as Eros. Redival is much more concerned with the physical aspect of love more than anything else. We see this represented through many of her actions. In her younger years, we see that she constantly seeks the companionship of a man. She is always speaking of â€Å"love,† and in chapter 3, Redival is found outside kissing one of the guardsmen. Romance is high in her mind and could even be said to be her main goal. She avoid being around the Fox and Orual because she is so concerned with romantic love that there is no more room in her mind for any other kind of love. She seeks out cheap love and doesn’t care about the consequences. When she is found kissing the guardsman, the consequences don’t affect her directly. The guardsman was castrated, and the King blamed the Fox and Orual for Redival’s actions and forced Redival to spend her time with them. â€Å"Thus a ll the comfort we had was destroyed when Redival joined us.† (Till We 30) Redival loved carelessly and it tore apart the people around her. Why does Redival feel that she has to seek out love so desperately? The answer lies in her childhood. Before Psyche was born, Redival was the baby of the family and she was far more beautiful than Orual. Growing up, they were close and had a good friendship. But, when Psyche was born, everyone’s attention suddenly shifted from her to the new, perfect little baby. Redival felt abandoned by her sister and jealous of the new baby because of all the love that she was receiving. That jealousy fueled her desperate search for love wherever she could find it. Orual’s love and abandonment had left a chasm in her heart that she could not figure out how to fill. Redival believes that romantic love is the solution to all of her problems. Bardia is introduced as a dutiful and caring captain of the palace guard, but throughout the novel, h e works his way up to become one of Orual’s closest, most loyal and trusted advisors. Bardia most closely represents a friendship-love. He demonstrates great friendship towards Orual through his dedication to his job. At the beginning of his friendship with her, he offers to give her sword lessons out of the kindness of his heart because he knows how it feels to be in a deep depression like Orual was after Psyche was taken to the mountain. He gives her lessons every day for a while, and eventually Orual informed him of her plan to go to the mountain to collect Psyche’s body for burial. When she tells him this, he offers to go in her place, but Orual insisted on going, so he agreed to accompany her. His decision here is an accurate representation of his total and complete display of friendship-love through his loyalty. By deciding to go to the mountain, he was taking a massive risk in his loyalty to the king. Bardia lied to the king about his whereabouts and if the king found out, he might have lost his position in the palace guard, which would have affected not just himself, but also his family. Throughout the novel, there are very few characters that actually see past the ugliness and understand and appreciate just who Orual is as a person. Bardia is one of those few people, partially because he doesn’t really even see her as a woman and even grieves that she is not a man when he says, â€Å"‘It’s a thousand pities, Lady, that you weren’t a man,’ said Bardia, ‘You’ve a man’s reach and a quick eye.’† (Till We 74) He views Orual as a person with value and purpose. He doesn’t place her value in her outward appearance like many of the people in Glome do. He sees past her ugliness and bonds with her over sword fighting and politics. They form a friendship because of their shared interests. Lewis says in The Four Loves, â€Å"Friendship arises out of mere Companionship when two or more of the companions discover that they have in common some insight or interest.† (Four Loves 83) The relationship between Orual and Bardia goes from companionship to friendship when they journey up the mountain because they develop that common interest. They are both invested in the journey and they bond over their shared interest in Psyche. They work well together and as Lewis says of friendship â€Å"they stand together in immense solitude.† (Four Loves 83) The Fox is a slave from the Greeklands and is also the wise and caring teacher that practically raised Orual, Redival, and Psyche. He functions as a sort of father figure to Orual and Psyche because Orual’s father did not fulfill his proper duties as a parent. He loves the girls as if they were his own and cares about them deeply. Although he does not believe in the gods, he still displays a â€Å"gift-love† as Lewis describes in The Four Loves. He loves the girls unconditionally, sacrificially, and without any expectations of reciprocation from them. When Orual sets the Fox free, he considers leaving but before he does, he decides to stay. He decides to stay in the place where he spent most of his life enslaved, unable to see his own children grow up. â€Å"‘Wish me well, daughter,’ he said. ‘For I have won a battle. What’s best for his fellows must be best for a man. I am but a limb of the Whole and must work in the socket where I’m put. I’ll stay,’† (Till We 238) He chooses to stay because he knows how important it is to Orual that he be there with her while she is queen. Out of love, he stays, willing to sacrifice his own personal comforts for the sake of others. This quote showcases his great humility and â€Å"gift-love† which Lewis says in The Four Loves is equivalent to Divine Love, love from God. â€Å"Our Gift-Loves are really God-like; and among our Gift-loves those are most God-like which are most boundless and unwearied in giving.† (Four Loves 9) Desp ite the Fox’s unbelief in the gods, he still showcases a divine and giving love through his sacrificial decision to stay in the city that enslaved him and tore him away from his home and his children. He cares so greatly for Orual and Psyche that he would rather spend his last days in a foreign land than in the place he calls home where he could see his own children. He loves them like and possibly greater than his own flesh-and-blood.Out of all the characters in the book, Orual has the most perverted, twisted concept of love. Her true ugliness is showcased throughout the novel by the way she treats other people. Ansit, Bardia’s wife, describes the way that Orual loves best when she says, â€Å"Oh, Queen Orual, I begin to think you know nothing of love. Perhaps you who spring from the gods love like the gods. Like the Shadowbrute. They say the loving and the devouring are all one, don’t they? You’re full fed. Gorged with other men’s lives, womenâ €™s too: Bardia’s, mine, the Fox’s, your sister’s—both your sisters.† (Till We 300) The irony in this quote is that while Ansit is saying this about Orual at the end of the book, if we look back to chapter 5, we see the priest says nearly the same thing about Ungit: â€Å"And when the Brute is Ungit it lies with the man, and when it is her son it lies with the woman. And either way there is a devouring many different things are said many sacred stories many great mysteries. Some say the loving and the devouring are all the same thing. For in sacred language we say that a woman who lies with a man devours the man.† (Till We 56-57) Orual only loves three people in the story; Bardia, the Fox, and Psyche. In each character, we see how Orual’s devouring love consumed all of the life out of them, leaving nothing behind. With Bardia, she tried so hard just to keep him near her. When she was Queen, the only way for her to keep Bardia near her was to overwork him and give him meaningless jobs. Bardia, of course, always accepted the work with no pushback, because he is so loyal and could never say no. This, in the end, is what killed him. Orual realizes her mistake when Ansit tells her that she overworked Bardia, â€Å"He was tired. He had worked himself out or been worked. Ten years ago he should have given over and lived as old men do. He was not made of iron or brass, but flesh.† (Till We 195) What is ironic when Ansit says this to Orual is that just a few pages earlier, Orual blames Bardia’s death on Ansit â€Å"stealing† him away from his work. This is such a vivid example of just how horribly Orual treated people. She saw them as objects, for her own using as she pleased, and not as living and breathing human life, with emotions of their own. Orual’s world revolved around getting herself whatever she wanted and never stopped for a second to consider the happiness of others. Instead of giving what Lewis would call â€Å"Affection† or â€Å"storge† in Greek, Orual seeks out the affections of other, tearing them away for her own pleasure. Orual thought that she loved the Fox, but in reality she abused the love that he showed her, and ended up consuming his entire life with hers. She could not even show true gratitude to the Fox when he died, because when he died, Orual just left him there for an hour and did not even think about the significant impact that the Fox had in her life. In fact she says nearly the opposite of the event, â€Å"And so the thing that I had thought of for so many years at last slipped by in a huddle of business which was, at that moment, of more consequence. Yet I have often noticed since ho w much less stir nearly everyone’s death makes than you might expect. Men better loved and more worth loing than my father go down making only a small eddy.† (Till We 243) Orual considered the Fox’s death to be insignificant and treated it like a business transaction, dehumanizing the event, just like she did with Bardia’s life, not treating him like a human, but like an object or an animal. She could not even stop for a moment to grieve and to take in that the Fox just died right in front of her. Rather, she stayed picking out armor with Bardia. Considering what Ansit said about how Orual treated Bardia, â€Å"He was not made of iron or brass, but flesh,† (Till We 195) we see that she treated the Fox the same way, less significant than some chunks of metal, holding less value than armor. There is beautiful symbolism there. Armor is meant to protect people in battle, and so it is very valuable, but only when it is protecting human life. Armor is of no use if the person it is protecting is dead. Bardia and the Fox gave their lives sacrificially, but Orual treated them like mere pieces of armor. They were incredibly wonderful and valuable when they were alive, but Orual treated them poorly and abused the love that they both so sacrificially gave her. So now that they are dead, that â€Å"armor† is useless because there is nothing more to protect. The Fox’s love for Orual was sacrificial, forgiving, unconditional, and most of all, selfless. He recognized that the world did not revolve around himself and the comforts that he desired. This being so, he understood that no matter how much he loved Orual and Psyche, he had to control his love because otherwise it would prevent the girls from achieving their full potential. For example, when Orual says that she will battle Argan, the Fox protests because he is afraid that she will get herself killed. For this reason, he goes and tries to convince her not to fig ht, but she does it anway. He later apologizes to Orual because he realized that he should not have used his own desires to try and coerce her from the path that she truly desired, which, ironically, is exactly what Orual did to Psyche. The Fox had the humility to be able to go back and apologize for the way that his love negatively affected Orual. However Orual did not have the decency to own up to her actions and take responsibility for the death of her loved ones because of her devouring â€Å"love.† If love truly is the most important concept for humanity to grasp and understand, then we must look at what the Bible says about love in order to know what love should look like. 1 Corinthians 13:4-5 says â€Å"Love is patient and kind; love does not envy or boast; it is not arrogant or rude. It does not insist on its own way; it is not irritable or resentful.† (English Standard Version 1 Corinthians 13) Comparing this to Orual’s way of love, we see a stark diffe rence. Orual was not patient or kind to the people that she loved. With Psyche on the mountain, she showed no amount of patience. Showing patience in that situation would have meant trying to understand what Psyche is thinking and considering that she might actually be happy living up there. Instead, Orual was impatient and tried to force Psyche to do what Orual wanted, which is where we see our second contradiction. Orual insisted on her own way in all of her relationships. With Psyche, she stabbed herself in the arm and threatened to kill Psyche and herself just to try and convince Psyche that her way was best and that there were no other choices. With Bardia, she insisted that he work with her and for her and she never stopped to consider his own health and happiness, because that didn’t matter to her. She was so consumed with her own way that she could not see how she was destroying these people. Now, if we examine this same passage against the way that Psyche loves, we f ind something rather interesting. Patient and kind: in all of her relationships Psyche shows great amounts of patience. When Orual was on the mountain with her, screaming at her, she remained calm. Time after time, she tried to understand Orual, displaying great amounts of patience simply because she loved her sister so much. Psyche never insisted on her own way, even when she found out that she was going to be sacrificed. When Orual threatened Psyche, she gave in to Orual’s way, simply because she cared so much about Orual that she couldn’t just let her die. She gave up everything that she knew was true, just to see her sister live. 1 John 4:7-21 also talks about love in great depth. It says that we should love one another because of the way that God loves us. (English Standard Version 1 John 4:7-21) Verse 18 says â€Å" There is no fear in love, but perfect love casts out fear. For fear has to do with punishment, and whoever fears has not been perfected in love.† Orual’s love was full of fear. Her devouring came as a result of that fear. She devoured everyone that she loved because she was so afraid of losing them. Psyche never feared. Even when she was about to be taken from the people that she loved to be sacrificed, she did not fear. Lewis said it best in The Four Loves, â€Å"Every Christian would agree that a man’s spiritual health is exactly proportional to h is love for God.† (Four Loves 3) It is clear to see that the reason there was so much corruption in the way that Orual loved was because she did not have a love for God or the gods. Psyche did, and this love for the gods led her to better love other people. In our lives, we must not forget that when we love, it is not about us. It’s about God. Each person is made in the image of God, so when we love other people, it is like we are loving God. But if we love God first it will be much easier to love others. Because, after all, God is love. We cannot properly love other people until we ourselves know God’s love.

The Females Headcoverings Essays - 2075 Words

Genesis5 24:65 → Rebbecca covers herself with her veil/shawl6 when she sees her future husband for the first time. Genesis 38:14,19 → Tamar covered herself with a veil7 as part of her attire as a prostitute 8 Numbers 5:18 → The priest uncovers9 the head of a woman accused of adultery 10 Isaiah 3:20 and 3:23 → God removes various fashion accessories of prideful women11, 12, 13 Song of Solomon 5:7 → The wifes veil/shawl14 was taken by the city watchmen Song of Solomon 4:1,3 6:7 → The wifes temples and eyes are behind her veil15 Isaiah 47:2 → God shames the â€Å"daughter of Babylon† by removing her veil16 and skirt The Males Headcoverings . Exodus 28:4, 37, 39; 29:6; 39:2817 31; Leviticus 8:9, 16:4 → Part of the priests†¦show more content†¦Alan Ingalls of Baptist Bible Seminary summarizes the Old Testament passages:35 Men put on headcoverings as signs of humility or mourning. Women put on headcoverings as signs of dignity and modesty. Headcoverings In The New Testament 1st Corinthians 11:2-16 (NASB)36 (2) Now I praise you37 because you remember me in everything and hold firmly to the traditions, just as I delivered them to you.38 (3) But39 I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ. (4) Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying40 disgraces his head. (5) But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying disgraces her head, for she is one and the same as the woman whose head is shaved. (6) For41 if a woman does not cover her head,42 let her also have her hair cut off; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head.43 (7) For a man ought not to have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man. (8) For man does not originate from woman, but woman from man;44 (9) for indeed man was not created for the womans sake, but woman for the mans sake.45 (10) Therefore the woman ought to have a symbol46 of authority on her head, because of the angels. (11) However, in the Lord, neither is woman independent of man, nor is man

American Influence and Foreign Policy in Iranian...

Did American foreign policy and influence lead to the Iranian revolution and spark the Iranian hostage crisis? Part A This investigation determines to what extent American foreign policy, within the years 1953-1982, caused the Iranian embassy siege. Furthermore, it questions the role that the Carter and Kennedy administrations had in furthering the American agenda within Iran. In order to assess the role American influence played, this investigation evaluates the relations between the Carter administration and Mohammed Raza Pahlevi during his tenure as Shah. Carter’s Middle-Eastern foreign policy is examined to gain further insight into the influence that the United States had over Pahlevi. Also, the role that the televised address from†¦show more content†¦Iranians believed that Pahlevi should be returned to Iran to face charges for his actions. The conflict lasted 444 days due to Khomeini’s support of situation. It was used as a bargaining chip to unfreeze the Shahs assets and return them to Iran. Furthermore, Khomeini demanded that the Shah was returned to Iran to face tri al for his actions. Khomeini accused the U.S. of exploiting Iran’s resources and money. He claimed that because of U.S. exploitation, Iranians were forced to engage in a revolution where Iranian blood was shed. Operation Canadian Caper rescued 7 Americans using a plot that involved them filming a Sci-Fi movie within Iran. Part C The film Argo directed by Ben Affleck takes us within Operation Canadian Caper.Argo was produced in 2012 for entertainment value. It has a strong American bias as it fails to recognize Canadian involvement within Operation Canadian Caper. Furthermore, some of the scene within the movie are fictional to increase Hollywood hype.Argo was praised by Tony Mendez and Lee Schatz, the two men in charge of Operation Canadian Caper, for accurately reporting the events of said operation. Furthermore, it â€Å" The Islamic Revolution of 1979: The Downfall of American- Iranian Relations† analyzes American- Iranian diplomacy from 1953- 1979. It is an explanation of the causes and developments of the Iranian revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini’s rise to power andShow MoreRelatedThe Iranian Hostage Crisis Of 19791667 Words   |  7 PagesThe Iranian Hostage Crisis of 1979 was an event that profoundly impacted Western-Iranian relations, to the extent that its residual effects still linger today. Iran’s revolution of 1979 resulted in a regime change that saw U.S.-supported Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi toppled by the formerly-exiled Ayotollah Khomeini, who promptly instated a strongly anti-Western regime that established itself as ideologically in direct opposition to many Western values. This anti-Western, and particularly anti-AmericanRead MoreForeign Policy Has The Diplomatic Pendulum Swept So Wide An Arc Essay1078 Words   |  5 Pageshistory of U.S foreign policy has t he diplomatic pendulum swept so wide an arc over such a short span of time. The swift regime change Iran witnessed in 1979 set forth a series of events that would define U.S relations with the Middle Eastern nation for decades to follow. It never occurred to me that one incident that lasted a little over a year could have such drastic repercussions. This infamous calamity, known as the Iran Hostage Crisis, had its seeds planted during the Iranian Revolution when RezaRead MoreForeign Policy Can Be A Slippery Slope1844 Words   |  8 PagesAction, There is an Equal and Opposite Reaction Foreign policy can be a slippery slope, it’s difficult to have a policy between two diverse countries where their beliefs, values, and cultures are entirely different. As a result, when countries are entwined within a foreign policy, the decisions made may only benefit the very few people at the top. Unfortunately, when the leader of a country only takes their needs and wants into account and disregards policies to help make their country better domesticallyRead MoreThe Conflict Between Iran And The United Nations1705 Words   |  7 PagesThe American hostage crisis occurred in Iran on November 4, 1979 when Iranians forcibly took control of the American embassy in Tehran. The Iran hostage crisis had its origins in a series of events that took place nearly a half-century before it began. The source of tension between Iran and the U.S. stemmed from an increasingly intense conflict over oil which continued throughout the years and fueled Iran’s hatred of Western influence throughout the revolution. During the midst of the revolution, AmericanRead MoreThe United States Involvement2438 Words   |  10 PagesSince the early 1900s the United States has been embroiled in Iranian affairs, something that would have great effects both in 1979 and now. The United States’ interest in Iran was originally spurred by the discovery of oil, but due to the Cold War U.S. interest in Iran grew even more for strategic reasons. To continue to exert their influence in Iran, the United States, through the CIA, installed shah Pahlavi as ruler. The shah was a cruel and strict dictator and was eventually overthrown andRead MoreThe Iranian Hostage Crisis Of Iran1940 Words   |  8 Pagessix were being held hostage by Iranian revolutionaries. The road leading to this climactic period in American and Iranian history led back to almost thirty years of growing anti-American resentment. The Shah and the Supreme Ayatollah of Iran were at odds, creating a power struggl e unlike any seen in modern history. The interaction of Western influence and Islamic culture and social structure reacted in an explosive way, culminating in what is now called the Iranian Hostage Crisis. The beginning factorsRead MoreEffects of Iranian Hostage Crisis1853 Words   |  8 Pagesï » ¿How Has the Iranian Hostage Crisis Affected the United States? For most Americans, the story begins in 1979 with the Iranian Hostage Crisis, when a group of revolutionary university students took over the American Embassy in Tehran, Iran, and held 52 American diplomats, intelligence officers and Marines hostage for 444 days. But for most Iranians, and to fully understand the repercussions of this aforementioned event, the story begins almost three decades prior, in 1953. This was the year thatRead MoreThe Iran Hostage Crisis2438 Words   |  10 Pagesturbulent time in American history. In 1976, Jimmy Carter was elected to the presidency, and he had many goals to help better America. However, on November 4th, 1979, a group of radical students seized the United States’ embassy in Tehran, Iran. This completely altered the course of American history and relations with the Middle East. This crisis had many impacts on the United States. It caused the Energy Crisis which in turn caused the Recession of 1979. The Iran Hostage Crisis also had pol iticalRead MoreThe Discovery Of The Pahlavi Dynasty1907 Words   |  8 Pageswere responsible for two of the most important aspects of Iran: The safavids made Shia Islam the official state religion in Iran, starting with Ismail 1 in 1501, and the Qajar’s gave the muslim clergy- The ulema- political power. The first major revolution in Iran was in 1906. It forced the ruling Qajar’s to accept a constitution, it created a parliament and put some limits on the king. It ultimately failed party because the clergy withdrew their support, partly because the Shah worked very activelyRead MoreJimmy Carter and the Iranian Hostage Crisis Essays1031 Words   |  5 PagesPresidents economic stimulus program, it received about $8 billion for Public Service Employment and other programs under CETA.† The Department helped expand the Job Corps and training programs, this developed new ways to gain employment for the Native Americans and rural workers. A program was set up later to help improve displaced workers for future jobs by teaching them new skills that they didn’t quite understand. The Department soon took on big responsibilities and they had to be more aware of job safety

Application on Family Law and Administrative Law in the Case Study

Questions: Professor Kingsfield, 53, and his wife, Angela, 50, had no children of their own. Professor Kingsfield was well-liked by all his students in his university.The two of them were a loving couple. Angela and Kingsfield owned a house, a good quality bungalow, as joint-tenants. It was a beautiful house that they lived in for many years. Since they had no children, they invited Kingsfields aged mother (his only surviving parent) to live with them. Angela took very good care of her mother-in-law. Kingsfields only sibling, his brother, Arthur, visits their mother at Kingsfields house often.Angelas only surviving immediate family member was her sister, Dorothy. Her parents passed away long ago. Her brother, Ken, also passed away in 2010, leaving behind two daughters, Kate and Paula, who were very fond of Angela. Angelas nieces, Kate Paula, often stayed over in Angelas house during school vacations.Kingsfield owned other assets, such as his BMW X5 car, three (3) sole bank accounts and an anti que collection worth $2 million.Angela, too, had her own assets, such as her Mazda 6 car, two (2) sole bank accounts and lots of jewellery of gold and precious stones.Unfortunately, since 2011, Kingsfield and Angela started having frequent quarrels. They separated from each other when Kingsfield moved out of the house and stayed with a friend. 4 years later, Angela applied for divorce. Kingsfield said that, although he did not contact her in the past 4 years, he still loved her, and would prefer not to consent to her application for divorce. The Court was going to hear the case on 15 May 2015.On 5 February 2015, Kingsfield and Angela were on their way to visit Angelas dying grandmother in the USA. They agreed not to tell her grandmother that they were separated. Unfortunately, the plane that they were travelling in crashed. When the search and rescue team arrived at the scene, they were both found dead.Neither of them had made a Will.The family was in total shock and disbelief. Afte r the funeral matters were settled, the family members had to attend to the estate matters of Kingsfield and Angela.Applying your understanding of the family law and the laws of succession in Singapore, please examine:-1. Examine the status of the marriage between Kingsfield and Angela at the date of their deaths.2. Kingsfield wished to oppose Angelas application for divorce, i.e., he did not want to consent to the divorce. If the case had been heard by the Court, please cite the laws that would have applied to their divorce proceedings, i.e., what grounds and/or reasons could Angela have given for her application. Also state whether or not, in your opinion, Kingsfield could have successfully opposed her divorce application, since he stated that he still loved Angela.3. Examine the status of each of the family members of the dead couple mentioned above, and state whether he or she would be a beneficiary of the estate of Kingsfield or Angela.a) You may wish to identify each of the as sets of the deceased persons, and apply the relevant laws to trace the beneficiaries.b) Please cite any laws or presumptions at law that you apply in arriving at your conclusions.c) Please address all the relatives mentioned in the set of facts above, and the proportions, if any, that each one would inherit. Answer: 1. At the time of death of Kingsfield and Angela, the status of their relationship was married to each other. As per the Divorce Act of Singapore, if a spouse lives separated for more than four years then the consent of that spouse is irrelevant as to their divorce, but it only can be granted by the court at the time of hearing, unless the hearing is done that couple shall be considered as married. Here the divorce has not been granted by the court before their death. 2. If the case is heard by the court then the consent of Kingsfield would have been irrelevant to divorce, as they are leaving separately for more than four years. As per the Divorce Act of Singapore, if any married couple leaving separately for more than a period of four years then no consent from the part of the defendant is required for granting divorce to that married couple. Here they are leaving separately for four and a half years, consent of defendant that is Kingsfield, is not mandatory for divorce (Lawsociety.org.sg, 2015). According to my opinion, the law is appropriate, and Kingsfield should not have the right to oppose the divorce, as if he would have love his wife then could not get separated for such a long period (Brown, 2012). 3. a) As per the information provided, both of them, Kingsfield and Angela, left their movable properties. For Kingsfield, his BMW X-5 car, all the deposited amounts in his three bank accounts and the antiques worth $ 2millions, and for Angela, her Mazda 6 car, all the deposits in her two bank accounts, and all the jewelries she left (Moncreiffe of that Ilk Armstrong, 2010). All the properties left by Kingsfield, shall be acquired by his mother (Le Bas Lawrence, 2011). His mother is the only beneficiary for all of his belongings. According to rule 5 of the INTESTATE SUCCESSION ACT, if any person died leaving his parent or parents and no other descendants then his property shall be acquired by the parent of the deceased person. As per this rule, all the properties of a deceased person shall be distributed among his parents, if there is only one parent alive then it shall be vested to that parent, unless the spouse or any children of the deceased person is alive (Kang Leong, 2012). Here, Kingsfield had no children, and his spouse died along with him, though he had a brother but according to the provisions of succession law in Singapore, his brother is not entitled to inherent his property when his mother is alive (Konrad Skaperdas, 2005). Properties in the name of Angela shall be acquired by her sister Dorothy and children of her deceased brother, Kate and Paula (Spierin, Fallon Pearce, 2003). As per rule 6 of the INTESTATE SUCCESSION ACT, if any person died and the spouse or parent is no more, then all the properties of that person shall be acquired by the brother and sisters and children of deceased brother and sister (Goldsmith, Comita Chua, 2011). Here, Angela died along with her husband, and her parent are also died, she dont have any children also, for that reason in accordance to the rule prescribed in the statute, her sister and the children of her deceased brother, Kate and Paula, shall acquire the properties left by Angela (Miller, 2010). b) The statutory provision prescribed the factual way of distribution of property of any person died intestate. As per the specified rules of the concern statute the above conclusion made. Here, both of them, Kingsfield and Angela died intestate but the rule of distribution of property is not the same for both of them, though they died along together as intestate and they did not have any children as their legal heir, the way of their distribution of property will not be the same, it mainly depends upon the heirs, after their death Kingsfield left his mother and brother. Angela left her sister, nieces, and grandmother. Depending upon that the properties belong to Kingsfield shall be distributed under one rule and the properties in the name of Angela shall be distributed in another rule. By virtue of that beneficiary persons would be different. There must not be any confusion regarding the evaluation of the properties as well as proper way of distribution. In case of the distribution of the properties belonged to Kingsfield, all the properties vested in the name of his mother, and his brother, Arthur will not get anything. In case of the distribution of properties belonged to Angela, all of her belongings shall be acquired by her sister, Dorothy and her nieces Kate and Paula (Heath, 2003). c) Kingsfield and Angela died together, leaving some of their relatives who can acquire their properties. They did not have any children. From the part of Kingsfield, his mother and his brother, Arthur was left behind; Angela left her sister Dorothy, daughters of her deceased brother, Kate and Paula, that is her nieces, and her grandmother. Under this particular scenario, the properties belongs Kingsfield and Paula shall be distributed in accordance to the rule 5 and rule 6, respectively, as specifies in the Intestate Succession Act (Peloso, 2003). In case of the distribution of the properties belong to Kingsfield , his mother shall be entitled to acquire all of his properties and his brother, Arthur shall not posses any of them, unless his mother is dead, as prescribed in rule 5 of the statute. In case of the distribution of the properties in the name of Angela shall be acquired by her sister, Dorothy and her nieces, Kate and Paula. In this distribution half portion of the entire property which is left by Angela shall be possessed by her sister Dorothy and the rest of the half portion of the property shall be equally distributed among her two nieces, Kate and Paula (Woon, 2010). References Brown, K. (2012).Hu Jintao. Singapore: World Scientific. Goldsmith, G., Comita, L., Chua, S. (2011). Evidence for arrested succession within a tropical forest fragment in Singapore.J. Trop. Ecol.,27(03), 323-326. doi:10.1017/s0266467411000010 Heath, C. (2003).Intellectual property law in Asia. London: Kluwer Law International. Kang, S., Leong, C. (2012).Singapore perspectives 2012. Singapore: World Scientific. Konrad, K., Skaperdas, S. (2005).Succession rules and leadership rents. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. Lawsociety.org.sg,. (2015).The Law Society of Singapore for Public You the Law Divorce. Retrieved 22 February 2015, from https://www.lawsociety.org.sg/forPublic/YoutheLaw/Divorce.aspx Le Bas, T., Lawrence, R. (2011).Singapore. Singapore: APA Publications. Miller, J. (2010). Species Distribution Modeling.Geography Compass,4(6), 490-509. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00351.x Moncreiffe of that Ilk, I., Armstrong, J. (2010).The law of succession. Edinburgh: John Donald, with assistance from St. Andrews Fund for Scots Heraldry. Peloso, J. (2003).Intellectual property. Bronx, N.Y.: H.W. Wilson Co. Spierin, B., Fallon, P., Pearce, R. (2003).The Succession Act 1965 and related legislation. Dublin: Butterworths. Woon, W. (2010).The Advocate's Devil. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.

Outline Negative Debate On Effects Of Hate Mongering Essays

Outline: Negative Debate on Effects of Hate Mongering I. Cross examination of attack on status-quo. Possible inherency 1. Rise in hate related crime do to lack of legislation. - All criminal acts deemed hate crimes are already illegal. If not they would not be their very nature be crimes. Questions - Is it true that the terrible acts that you described are already against the law? Is it also true that the "hate crimes" you have described are really just as affected by a lack of adequate police force than inadequate legislation? Would it be reasonable to assume that the afformentioned reason is true of any criminal act despite motive? Possible inherency 2. Inadequate punishment is being given to people who have committed "hate crimes". - Motive should not be the reason for an increased sentence, but severity of the crime. - Is it reasonable to assume that committing a criminal act on someone because of their race is terrible? Is it then also reasonable to assume that committing a criminal act on someone because they have refused your advances or simply because they got pleasure out of hurting people is also terrible? Are you than saying that the former case , the ones that you would call "hate crimes" are more terrible even if the actual act is the same? You do realize that this is what you are saying by assuming that hate crimes deserve a more severe punishment? Possible inherency 3. Rise in hate groups promotes violence. - People are not forced to listen to hate mongering groups. The people who mostly follow them are people who believe what they are preaching. - You are aware that you are recommending that we limit freedom of thought, even if the thought is deplorable? Are you aware that this is in direct violation with the first amendment of the United States Constitution? Do you realize that if such legislation were passed it would give precedence for Congress to be able to pass any law governing freedom of thought? Do you also realize that if the government could pass any legislation on free speech or thought that the ideals of liberty and democracy would be outlawed? Doesn't it then follow that by passing such a legislation we would be giving our government the power to , with another such law, suppress another great idea which could improve the world by accidentally limiting the right of expression by someone who would think up such an idea? Possible inherency 4. Marches and other assemblies by these hate mongering groups encourage hate crimes. - First amendment makes any legislation against this possible, and with good cause. - Are you aware if it was legal to limit assembly labor unions would never have formed, and the horrid factory conditions characterized by the 19th century, such as low wages long hours, overcrowding, and no concern of workers well being, would still be in existence? Couldn't such a legislation also accidentally prevent another great idea in the way of assembly from emerging? Possible Sections for speech against their plan. 1. The plan that my opponents have stated has many blaring inherent flaws. The first, and perhaps most obvious, is it total inability to be put into use. The first ammendment to the United States constitution states that, Congress shall pass no law violating anyones freedom of speech, religious belief, or right to assemble. It is obvious that this, one of the most important passages in the Bill of Rights, was placed there to prevent laws such as this, for the second we allow our government any control over our right of expression we have given them the presedence to pass other such laws. It was said by Walter Lippman, a respected political columnist, that "No official yet born on this earth is wise enough to seperate good ideas from bad ideas, good beliefs from bad ones." Mr. Lippman is correct. By silencing any ideas at all you have violated the most basic freedom that this great country bestows upon its people. 2. Another problem presented by the plan is its obvious lack of enforcability. How do they propose that we find who are the members of "hate groups"? Do we go on witch hunts for Klansmen? Come on if law enforcemnt officers can't control actuall crime that undeniably causes physical damage, how do you expect them to deal with crimes that do no physical damage, and that people can simply choose to avoid. I mean people can't just say to a mugger "Excuse me. I