The Females Headcoverings Essays - 2075 Words

Genesis5 24:65 → Rebbecca covers herself with her veil/shawl6 when she sees her future husband for the first time. Genesis 38:14,19 → Tamar covered herself with a veil7 as part of her attire as a prostitute 8 Numbers 5:18 → The priest uncovers9 the head of a woman accused of adultery 10 Isaiah 3:20 and 3:23 → God removes various fashion accessories of prideful women11, 12, 13 Song of Solomon 5:7 → The wifes veil/shawl14 was taken by the city watchmen Song of Solomon 4:1,3 6:7 → The wifes temples and eyes are behind her veil15 Isaiah 47:2 → God shames the â€Å"daughter of Babylon† by removing her veil16 and skirt The Males Headcoverings . Exodus 28:4, 37, 39; 29:6; 39:2817 31; Leviticus 8:9, 16:4 → Part of the priests†¦show more content†¦Alan Ingalls of Baptist Bible Seminary summarizes the Old Testament passages:35 Men put on headcoverings as signs of humility or mourning. Women put on headcoverings as signs of dignity and modesty. Headcoverings In The New Testament 1st Corinthians 11:2-16 (NASB)36 (2) Now I praise you37 because you remember me in everything and hold firmly to the traditions, just as I delivered them to you.38 (3) But39 I want you to understand that Christ is the head of every man, and the man is the head of a woman, and God is the head of Christ. (4) Every man who has something on his head while praying or prophesying40 disgraces his head. (5) But every woman who has her head uncovered while praying or prophesying disgraces her head, for she is one and the same as the woman whose head is shaved. (6) For41 if a woman does not cover her head,42 let her also have her hair cut off; but if it is disgraceful for a woman to have her hair cut off or her head shaved, let her cover her head.43 (7) For a man ought not to have his head covered, since he is the image and glory of God; but the woman is the glory of man. (8) For man does not originate from woman, but woman from man;44 (9) for indeed man was not created for the womans sake, but woman for the mans sake.45 (10) Therefore the woman ought to have a symbol46 of authority on her head, because of the angels. (11) However, in the Lord, neither is woman independent of man, nor is man

American Influence and Foreign Policy in Iranian...

Did American foreign policy and influence lead to the Iranian revolution and spark the Iranian hostage crisis? Part A This investigation determines to what extent American foreign policy, within the years 1953-1982, caused the Iranian embassy siege. Furthermore, it questions the role that the Carter and Kennedy administrations had in furthering the American agenda within Iran. In order to assess the role American influence played, this investigation evaluates the relations between the Carter administration and Mohammed Raza Pahlevi during his tenure as Shah. Carter’s Middle-Eastern foreign policy is examined to gain further insight into the influence that the United States had over Pahlevi. Also, the role that the televised address from†¦show more content†¦Iranians believed that Pahlevi should be returned to Iran to face charges for his actions. The conflict lasted 444 days due to Khomeini’s support of situation. It was used as a bargaining chip to unfreeze the Shahs assets and return them to Iran. Furthermore, Khomeini demanded that the Shah was returned to Iran to face tri al for his actions. Khomeini accused the U.S. of exploiting Iran’s resources and money. He claimed that because of U.S. exploitation, Iranians were forced to engage in a revolution where Iranian blood was shed. Operation Canadian Caper rescued 7 Americans using a plot that involved them filming a Sci-Fi movie within Iran. Part C The film Argo directed by Ben Affleck takes us within Operation Canadian Caper.Argo was produced in 2012 for entertainment value. It has a strong American bias as it fails to recognize Canadian involvement within Operation Canadian Caper. Furthermore, some of the scene within the movie are fictional to increase Hollywood hype.Argo was praised by Tony Mendez and Lee Schatz, the two men in charge of Operation Canadian Caper, for accurately reporting the events of said operation. Furthermore, it â€Å" The Islamic Revolution of 1979: The Downfall of American- Iranian Relations† analyzes American- Iranian diplomacy from 1953- 1979. It is an explanation of the causes and developments of the Iranian revolution, Ayatollah Khomeini’s rise to power andShow MoreRelatedThe Iranian Hostage Crisis Of 19791667 Words   |  7 PagesThe Iranian Hostage Crisis of 1979 was an event that profoundly impacted Western-Iranian relations, to the extent that its residual effects still linger today. Iran’s revolution of 1979 resulted in a regime change that saw U.S.-supported Mohammed Reza Shah Pahlavi toppled by the formerly-exiled Ayotollah Khomeini, who promptly instated a strongly anti-Western regime that established itself as ideologically in direct opposition to many Western values. This anti-Western, and particularly anti-AmericanRead MoreForeign Policy Has The Diplomatic Pendulum Swept So Wide An Arc Essay1078 Words   |  5 Pageshistory of U.S foreign policy has t he diplomatic pendulum swept so wide an arc over such a short span of time. The swift regime change Iran witnessed in 1979 set forth a series of events that would define U.S relations with the Middle Eastern nation for decades to follow. It never occurred to me that one incident that lasted a little over a year could have such drastic repercussions. This infamous calamity, known as the Iran Hostage Crisis, had its seeds planted during the Iranian Revolution when RezaRead MoreForeign Policy Can Be A Slippery Slope1844 Words   |  8 PagesAction, There is an Equal and Opposite Reaction Foreign policy can be a slippery slope, it’s difficult to have a policy between two diverse countries where their beliefs, values, and cultures are entirely different. As a result, when countries are entwined within a foreign policy, the decisions made may only benefit the very few people at the top. Unfortunately, when the leader of a country only takes their needs and wants into account and disregards policies to help make their country better domesticallyRead MoreThe Conflict Between Iran And The United Nations1705 Words   |  7 PagesThe American hostage crisis occurred in Iran on November 4, 1979 when Iranians forcibly took control of the American embassy in Tehran. The Iran hostage crisis had its origins in a series of events that took place nearly a half-century before it began. The source of tension between Iran and the U.S. stemmed from an increasingly intense conflict over oil which continued throughout the years and fueled Iran’s hatred of Western influence throughout the revolution. During the midst of the revolution, AmericanRead MoreThe United States Involvement2438 Words   |  10 PagesSince the early 1900s the United States has been embroiled in Iranian affairs, something that would have great effects both in 1979 and now. The United States’ interest in Iran was originally spurred by the discovery of oil, but due to the Cold War U.S. interest in Iran grew even more for strategic reasons. To continue to exert their influence in Iran, the United States, through the CIA, installed shah Pahlavi as ruler. The shah was a cruel and strict dictator and was eventually overthrown andRead MoreThe Iranian Hostage Crisis Of Iran1940 Words   |  8 Pagessix were being held hostage by Iranian revolutionaries. The road leading to this climactic period in American and Iranian history led back to almost thirty years of growing anti-American resentment. The Shah and the Supreme Ayatollah of Iran were at odds, creating a power struggl e unlike any seen in modern history. The interaction of Western influence and Islamic culture and social structure reacted in an explosive way, culminating in what is now called the Iranian Hostage Crisis. The beginning factorsRead MoreEffects of Iranian Hostage Crisis1853 Words   |  8 Pagesï » ¿How Has the Iranian Hostage Crisis Affected the United States? For most Americans, the story begins in 1979 with the Iranian Hostage Crisis, when a group of revolutionary university students took over the American Embassy in Tehran, Iran, and held 52 American diplomats, intelligence officers and Marines hostage for 444 days. But for most Iranians, and to fully understand the repercussions of this aforementioned event, the story begins almost three decades prior, in 1953. This was the year thatRead MoreThe Iran Hostage Crisis2438 Words   |  10 Pagesturbulent time in American history. In 1976, Jimmy Carter was elected to the presidency, and he had many goals to help better America. However, on November 4th, 1979, a group of radical students seized the United States’ embassy in Tehran, Iran. This completely altered the course of American history and relations with the Middle East. This crisis had many impacts on the United States. It caused the Energy Crisis which in turn caused the Recession of 1979. The Iran Hostage Crisis also had pol iticalRead MoreThe Discovery Of The Pahlavi Dynasty1907 Words   |  8 Pageswere responsible for two of the most important aspects of Iran: The safavids made Shia Islam the official state religion in Iran, starting with Ismail 1 in 1501, and the Qajar’s gave the muslim clergy- The ulema- political power. The first major revolution in Iran was in 1906. It forced the ruling Qajar’s to accept a constitution, it created a parliament and put some limits on the king. It ultimately failed party because the clergy withdrew their support, partly because the Shah worked very activelyRead MoreJimmy Carter and the Iranian Hostage Crisis Essays1031 Words   |  5 PagesPresidents economic stimulus program, it received about $8 billion for Public Service Employment and other programs under CETA.† The Department helped expand the Job Corps and training programs, this developed new ways to gain employment for the Native Americans and rural workers. A program was set up later to help improve displaced workers for future jobs by teaching them new skills that they didn’t quite understand. The Department soon took on big responsibilities and they had to be more aware of job safety

Application on Family Law and Administrative Law in the Case Study

Questions: Professor Kingsfield, 53, and his wife, Angela, 50, had no children of their own. Professor Kingsfield was well-liked by all his students in his university.The two of them were a loving couple. Angela and Kingsfield owned a house, a good quality bungalow, as joint-tenants. It was a beautiful house that they lived in for many years. Since they had no children, they invited Kingsfields aged mother (his only surviving parent) to live with them. Angela took very good care of her mother-in-law. Kingsfields only sibling, his brother, Arthur, visits their mother at Kingsfields house often.Angelas only surviving immediate family member was her sister, Dorothy. Her parents passed away long ago. Her brother, Ken, also passed away in 2010, leaving behind two daughters, Kate and Paula, who were very fond of Angela. Angelas nieces, Kate Paula, often stayed over in Angelas house during school vacations.Kingsfield owned other assets, such as his BMW X5 car, three (3) sole bank accounts and an anti que collection worth $2 million.Angela, too, had her own assets, such as her Mazda 6 car, two (2) sole bank accounts and lots of jewellery of gold and precious stones.Unfortunately, since 2011, Kingsfield and Angela started having frequent quarrels. They separated from each other when Kingsfield moved out of the house and stayed with a friend. 4 years later, Angela applied for divorce. Kingsfield said that, although he did not contact her in the past 4 years, he still loved her, and would prefer not to consent to her application for divorce. The Court was going to hear the case on 15 May 2015.On 5 February 2015, Kingsfield and Angela were on their way to visit Angelas dying grandmother in the USA. They agreed not to tell her grandmother that they were separated. Unfortunately, the plane that they were travelling in crashed. When the search and rescue team arrived at the scene, they were both found dead.Neither of them had made a Will.The family was in total shock and disbelief. Afte r the funeral matters were settled, the family members had to attend to the estate matters of Kingsfield and Angela.Applying your understanding of the family law and the laws of succession in Singapore, please examine:-1. Examine the status of the marriage between Kingsfield and Angela at the date of their deaths.2. Kingsfield wished to oppose Angelas application for divorce, i.e., he did not want to consent to the divorce. If the case had been heard by the Court, please cite the laws that would have applied to their divorce proceedings, i.e., what grounds and/or reasons could Angela have given for her application. Also state whether or not, in your opinion, Kingsfield could have successfully opposed her divorce application, since he stated that he still loved Angela.3. Examine the status of each of the family members of the dead couple mentioned above, and state whether he or she would be a beneficiary of the estate of Kingsfield or Angela.a) You may wish to identify each of the as sets of the deceased persons, and apply the relevant laws to trace the beneficiaries.b) Please cite any laws or presumptions at law that you apply in arriving at your conclusions.c) Please address all the relatives mentioned in the set of facts above, and the proportions, if any, that each one would inherit. Answer: 1. At the time of death of Kingsfield and Angela, the status of their relationship was married to each other. As per the Divorce Act of Singapore, if a spouse lives separated for more than four years then the consent of that spouse is irrelevant as to their divorce, but it only can be granted by the court at the time of hearing, unless the hearing is done that couple shall be considered as married. Here the divorce has not been granted by the court before their death. 2. If the case is heard by the court then the consent of Kingsfield would have been irrelevant to divorce, as they are leaving separately for more than four years. As per the Divorce Act of Singapore, if any married couple leaving separately for more than a period of four years then no consent from the part of the defendant is required for granting divorce to that married couple. Here they are leaving separately for four and a half years, consent of defendant that is Kingsfield, is not mandatory for divorce (Lawsociety.org.sg, 2015). According to my opinion, the law is appropriate, and Kingsfield should not have the right to oppose the divorce, as if he would have love his wife then could not get separated for such a long period (Brown, 2012). 3. a) As per the information provided, both of them, Kingsfield and Angela, left their movable properties. For Kingsfield, his BMW X-5 car, all the deposited amounts in his three bank accounts and the antiques worth $ 2millions, and for Angela, her Mazda 6 car, all the deposits in her two bank accounts, and all the jewelries she left (Moncreiffe of that Ilk Armstrong, 2010). All the properties left by Kingsfield, shall be acquired by his mother (Le Bas Lawrence, 2011). His mother is the only beneficiary for all of his belongings. According to rule 5 of the INTESTATE SUCCESSION ACT, if any person died leaving his parent or parents and no other descendants then his property shall be acquired by the parent of the deceased person. As per this rule, all the properties of a deceased person shall be distributed among his parents, if there is only one parent alive then it shall be vested to that parent, unless the spouse or any children of the deceased person is alive (Kang Leong, 2012). Here, Kingsfield had no children, and his spouse died along with him, though he had a brother but according to the provisions of succession law in Singapore, his brother is not entitled to inherent his property when his mother is alive (Konrad Skaperdas, 2005). Properties in the name of Angela shall be acquired by her sister Dorothy and children of her deceased brother, Kate and Paula (Spierin, Fallon Pearce, 2003). As per rule 6 of the INTESTATE SUCCESSION ACT, if any person died and the spouse or parent is no more, then all the properties of that person shall be acquired by the brother and sisters and children of deceased brother and sister (Goldsmith, Comita Chua, 2011). Here, Angela died along with her husband, and her parent are also died, she dont have any children also, for that reason in accordance to the rule prescribed in the statute, her sister and the children of her deceased brother, Kate and Paula, shall acquire the properties left by Angela (Miller, 2010). b) The statutory provision prescribed the factual way of distribution of property of any person died intestate. As per the specified rules of the concern statute the above conclusion made. Here, both of them, Kingsfield and Angela died intestate but the rule of distribution of property is not the same for both of them, though they died along together as intestate and they did not have any children as their legal heir, the way of their distribution of property will not be the same, it mainly depends upon the heirs, after their death Kingsfield left his mother and brother. Angela left her sister, nieces, and grandmother. Depending upon that the properties belong to Kingsfield shall be distributed under one rule and the properties in the name of Angela shall be distributed in another rule. By virtue of that beneficiary persons would be different. There must not be any confusion regarding the evaluation of the properties as well as proper way of distribution. In case of the distribution of the properties belonged to Kingsfield, all the properties vested in the name of his mother, and his brother, Arthur will not get anything. In case of the distribution of properties belonged to Angela, all of her belongings shall be acquired by her sister, Dorothy and her nieces Kate and Paula (Heath, 2003). c) Kingsfield and Angela died together, leaving some of their relatives who can acquire their properties. They did not have any children. From the part of Kingsfield, his mother and his brother, Arthur was left behind; Angela left her sister Dorothy, daughters of her deceased brother, Kate and Paula, that is her nieces, and her grandmother. Under this particular scenario, the properties belongs Kingsfield and Paula shall be distributed in accordance to the rule 5 and rule 6, respectively, as specifies in the Intestate Succession Act (Peloso, 2003). In case of the distribution of the properties belong to Kingsfield , his mother shall be entitled to acquire all of his properties and his brother, Arthur shall not posses any of them, unless his mother is dead, as prescribed in rule 5 of the statute. In case of the distribution of the properties in the name of Angela shall be acquired by her sister, Dorothy and her nieces, Kate and Paula. In this distribution half portion of the entire property which is left by Angela shall be possessed by her sister Dorothy and the rest of the half portion of the property shall be equally distributed among her two nieces, Kate and Paula (Woon, 2010). References Brown, K. (2012).Hu Jintao. Singapore: World Scientific. Goldsmith, G., Comita, L., Chua, S. (2011). Evidence for arrested succession within a tropical forest fragment in Singapore.J. Trop. Ecol.,27(03), 323-326. doi:10.1017/s0266467411000010 Heath, C. (2003).Intellectual property law in Asia. London: Kluwer Law International. Kang, S., Leong, C. (2012).Singapore perspectives 2012. Singapore: World Scientific. Konrad, K., Skaperdas, S. (2005).Succession rules and leadership rents. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. Lawsociety.org.sg,. (2015).The Law Society of Singapore for Public You the Law Divorce. Retrieved 22 February 2015, from https://www.lawsociety.org.sg/forPublic/YoutheLaw/Divorce.aspx Le Bas, T., Lawrence, R. (2011).Singapore. Singapore: APA Publications. Miller, J. (2010). Species Distribution Modeling.Geography Compass,4(6), 490-509. doi:10.1111/j.1749-8198.2010.00351.x Moncreiffe of that Ilk, I., Armstrong, J. (2010).The law of succession. Edinburgh: John Donald, with assistance from St. Andrews Fund for Scots Heraldry. Peloso, J. (2003).Intellectual property. Bronx, N.Y.: H.W. Wilson Co. Spierin, B., Fallon, P., Pearce, R. (2003).The Succession Act 1965 and related legislation. Dublin: Butterworths. Woon, W. (2010).The Advocate's Devil. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.